| 中美一流研究型大学本科课程设置之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 任钢建.中美一流研究型大学本科课程设置之比较[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(12):21-24,29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 任钢建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 贵阳学院,贵州贵阳,550005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在研究型大学中,本科教育处于重要的基础地位,而课程设置是本科教育的基础,课程设置体系蕴含着丰富的教育思想和人才培养理念,体现了大学的人才培养模式和办学特色.通过对中美一流研究型大学本科课程的比较分析,可以从中领悟和探究隐藏在课程背后各自的人才培养模式的差异,从而为我国高等教育改革提供有益的启示.
|
| 关 键 词： | 中美 本科课程 培养模式 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-7667（2006）12-0021-04 |
Comparison of the Undergraduate Curricula in First-Class Research Universities between China and the U.S.A. |
| |
| REN Gang-jian.Comparison of the Undergraduate Curricula in First-Class Research Universities between China and the U.S.A.[J].Comparative Education Review,2006,27(12):21-24,29. |
| |
| Authors: | REN Gang-jian |
| |
| Institution: | REN Gang-jian |
| |
| Abstract: | In research universities, undergraduate education occupies an important place, which, in turn, is based on the curriculum design. The design of the course system contains rich education ideology and training ideas, reflecting the training modes and educating features. By comparing the undergraduate curricula in the first-class research universities in China and in the U.S.A, the differences between the education ideology and training modes behind the curriculum design can be explored and understood, which may provide beneficial enlightening for the higher education reform in our country. |
| |
| Keywords: | China and America undergraduate curricula training mode comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
