| 我国刑法司法解释违法性问题研究——以盗窃罪定罪量刑标准地区差异为视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢焕.我国刑法司法解释违法性问题研究——以盗窃罪定罪量刑标准地区差异为视角[J].宜春学院学报,2010,32(3):1-5. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢焕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学,北京,100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目前我国存在大量的刑法司法解释,一些解释中存在违法现象.如最高司法机关对盗窃罪的司法解释,使全国很多地区盗窃罪定罪量刑的认定标准都存在巨大差异,实践中同样性质的盗窃案件在不同地区管辖,就会出现罪与非罪和量刑上的不同后果.这种违法现象引发的法律后果,第一,是对<立法法>的违反;第二,是对罪刑法定原则的背离.刑法司法解释中存在违法情况的原因,主要在于主体混乱、内容越权、非法授权等.要解决刑法司法解释的违法性问题,就要强化刑法立法解释,并对刑法司法解释的主体、内容进行规范.
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑法司法解释 盗窃罪 定罪量刑标准 地区差异 |
Study on illegal problem of our criminal judicial interpretation:on the Research of regional disparity of Conviction and sentencing standards in theft crime |
| |
| XIE Huan.Study on illegal problem of our criminal judicial interpretation:on the Research of regional disparity of Conviction and sentencing standards in theft crime[J].Journal of Yichun University,2010,32(3):1-5. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Huan |
| |
| Institution: | XIE Huan(China University of Political Science , Law,Beijing 100088,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | At present,our country has the massive criminal judicial interpretation,some has the illegal phenomenon.Such as the judicial interpretation of the theft crime by the highest judicial organ,causes the recognized standard of conviction and sentencing of theft crime exists huge differences in many areas of our country.In practice,the same quality's case will have different consequence in the crime and non-crime and sentencing under the jurisdiction of different regions.This phenomena of violating the law cause... |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal judicial interpretation theft crime standard of conviction and sentencing regional difference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
