| 班固“误读”《史记》原因解析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吕维洪.班固“误读”《史记》原因解析[J].楚雄师范学院学报,2009,24(7):87-91,97. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吕维洪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 曲靖师范学院,云南,曲靖,655000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 班固称赞司马迁"有良史之材,"<史记>是"不虚美,不隐恶"的实录之作,同时又批评司马迁"非谊士",<史记>有"史公三失".这种矛盾是由于班固在写作中,因无法摆脱司马迁的影响而产生焦虑,进而"误读"<史记>所致.
|
| 关 键 词： | 《史记》 《汉书》 批评 影响的焦虑 |
Analysis the Reasons of Ban Gu's Misreading of Records of the Historian |
| |
| LV Wei-hong.Analysis the Reasons of Ban Gu's Misreading of Records of the Historian[J].journal of chuxiong normal university,2009,24(7):87-91,97. |
| |
| Authors: | LV Wei-hong |
| |
| Institution: | LV Wei-hong(Department of Adult Education,Qujing Normal University,Qujing 655000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The historical ideas of Sigma Qian and Ban Gu are analyzed in this paper.They had many similar ideas and also many differences in historical ideas and historical background.The reason of these differences is due to the various cultural conditions and general moods of their times as well as their personal ideological differences. |
| |
| Keywords: | Records of the Historian Chronicles of the Han Dynasty critique influencing worriment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
