| 法律适用的裁判突袭——兼评《民事诉讼法》第179条第1款第10项再审事由 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梁开斌,林占发.法律适用的裁判突袭——兼评《民事诉讼法》第179条第1款第10项再审事由[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(2):81-86. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梁开斌 林占发 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 福建工程学院,法律系,福建,福州,350001
2. 泉州市中级人民检察院,福建,泉州,362000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法官可以对法律问题作积极地阐明，但是，当事人对法官适用法律的任何决定，都有权进行辩论，否则，就会造成法律适用的裁判突袭。出于防止突袭性裁判的需要，《民事诉讼法》第179条第1款第10项的解释与适用，应当涵盖裁判文书与辩论内容相脱节的情形。
|
| 关 键 词： | 突袭性裁判 阐明权 辩论权 |
On the Attacking Judgment of Legal Application |
| |
| LIANG Kai-bin,LIN Zhan-fa.On the Attacking Judgment of Legal Application[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science),2009(2):81-86. |
| |
| Authors: | LIANG Kai-bin LIN Zhan-fa |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Department of Law;Fujian Engineering College;Fuzhou;350001;China;2.Quanzhou Municipal Intermediate People's Procuratorate;Quanzhou;362000;China |
| |
| Abstract: | The judge may interpret the legal problems positively,but the parties have the right to debate for any legal dicision the judge adopts in a judgment,or the attacking judgment would be resulted in the legal application.For the purpose of preventing attacking judgment,the explanation and application of the article 179.1.10 of Civil Procedural Law of China should include the situations that the judge deprives the debating right of the party. |
| |
| Keywords: | attacking judgment right of interpretation debating right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
