首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Assessing Research Compliance for Federally Funded Projects: The Good,the Bad,and the Publicly Accessible
Authors:Rebekah Cummings  Andrea Payant  Betty Rozum  Michael Shelton  Ryan Bushman
Institution:1. Digital Matters Librarian, J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-2050;2. Metadata Librarian, Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-1538;3. Data Librarian, Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-8424;4. Research Data Library Assistant, Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-3937;5. Data Analytics Assistant, Merrill-Cazier Library, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-2000
Abstract:Abstract

In 2016, Utah State University launched a program to ensure their campus’ federal grant recipients were in compliance with funder mandates to share any data or publications produced as a result of the award. This article discusses how a cross-institutional team of librarians and administrators evaluated the success of this program using online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG) in conjunction with a traditional survey. The challenges and successes of using OAFGs to assess library services are also examined. An OAFG gave participants greater convenience, flexibility, participation, and time to craft answers, eliminating some of the hurdles to traditional focus group participation.
Keywords:Research data management  assessment  online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG)  grant compliance
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号