| "名辩逻辑"何以言衰 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘邦凡,张晓光."名辩逻辑"何以言衰[J].江西教育学院学报,2005,26(5):25-26. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘邦凡 张晓光 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 燕山大学文法学院,河北,秦皇岛,066004
2. 华东政法学院,上海,200042 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 命题“名辩逻辑衰落了”不能成立,其因在于：“名辩逻辑”乃近人界定,并非先秦已有,何以能够衰落？“名辩”与“逻辑”、“名辩逻辑”不是同义词,有“名辩”思潮衰落之实,而无“名辩逻辑”衰落之实,况且“名辩”的思维形式与思想方法一直影响着中国传统文化与传统文明的发展方向.
|
| 关 键 词： | 名辩 名学 辩学 逻辑 衰落 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-3638（2005）05-0025-02 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-07-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年7月7日 |
Were There the Comedown of the Ming-Bian Logic |
| |
| LIU Bang-fan,ZHANG Xiao-guang.Were There the Comedown of the Ming-Bian Logic[J].Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education,2005,26(5):25-26. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Bang-fan ZHANG Xiao-guang |
| |
| Institution: | 1.School of Humanities and Law, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004,China; 2.East China Institute of Politics and Law, Shanghai 200042,China |
| |
| Abstract: | There was not the comedown of the Ming-Bian logic because of the Ming-Bian logic was defined by modem people. There was the comedown of the thought of the Ming-Bian because of the Ming-Bian not being equal to the MingBian logic or logic. Moreover, the form and the method had been influencing the traditional culture or civilization of the ancient China. |
| |
| Keywords: | the Ming-Bian the Mingist the Bianist logic comedown |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
