| 火烧兰属中一个种的名称考辨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈心启,罗毅波.火烧兰属中一个种的名称考辨[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2002,40(5):465-469. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈心启 罗毅波 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对Epipactis consimilis、火烧兰 E．helleborine和疏花火烧兰 E．veratrifolia之间的形态作了比较，并对Epipactis consimilis D．Don作了名称考证。结果承认 Epipactis veratrifolia Boiss．et Hohen．为合法名称，以取代早先为Rolfe(1903)所接受、近来在《中国植物志》第17卷(1999)中使用的Epipactis consimilis D．Don。
|
| 关 键 词： | Epipactis consimilis 火烧兰 疏花火烧兰 |
The identity of a specific name of Epipactis |
| |
| CHEN Sing-Chi,LUO Yi-Bo.The identity of a specific name of Epipactis[J].Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2002,40(5):465-469. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Sing-Chi LUO Yi-Bo |
| |
| Abstract: | A morphological comparison is made between Epipactis consimilis D. Don, E. helleborine (L.) Crantz and E. veratrifolia Boiss. et Hohen. The true identity of Epipactis consimilis D. Don is discussed. As a result, Epipactis veratrifolia Boiss et Hohen., is recognized as a valid name to replace E. consimilis D. Don, a name formerly accepted by Rolfe and recently used in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae vol. 17. |
| |
| Keywords: | Epipactis consimilis E helleborine E veratrifolia |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
