首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论程端学驳前儒以“日月时例”解经
引用本文:周国琴.论程端学驳前儒以“日月时例”解经[J].内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,38(5):84-88.
作者姓名:周国琴
作者单位:南开大学历史学院 天津300071
摘    要:程端学是元代一位著名的《春秋》学者,其《春秋》学著作有《春秋本义》、《程氏春秋或问》和《春秋三传辨疑》三部。在这三部著作中,程端学循着朱熹的思路,从《春秋》之作和《春秋》之义的体现这两个角度对前儒以日月时例解经进行了激烈的攻驳,同时指出了以日月时例解经穿凿附会、破碎经旨、变乱是非等弊病,使《春秋》不以日月时为例的立论更具说服力。

关 键 词:程端学  春秋  日月时例  攻驳
文章编号:1000-5218(2006)05-0084-05
收稿时间:2006-06-03
修稿时间:2006-06-03

On Cheng Duan -xue's Denounce Refute of the Former Scholars Using Ri Yue Shi Li to Explain Spring and Autumn Annals
ZHOU Guo-qin.On Cheng Duan -xue''''s Denounce Refute of the Former Scholars Using Ri Yue Shi Li to Explain Spring and Autumn Annals[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Humanities & Social Sciences),2006,38(5):84-88.
Authors:ZHOU Guo-qin
Institution:History College of Nankai University, Tianjin 300071
Abstract:Cheng duan-xue was a famous scholar on the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in Yuan Dynasty.His bookmakings about Spring and Autumn Annals named Chun Qiu Ben Yi,Cheng Shi Chun Qiu Huo Wen and Chun Qiu San Zhuan Bian Yi.In these three bookmakings,Cheng duan-xue refuted former scholars using Ri Yue Shi li to explain Spring and Autumn Annals.In this point,he followed Zhuxi's thought.He refuted former scholars from the making of Spring and Autumn Annals and the embodiment of Spring and Autumn Annals's meaning these two angles.At the same time,he pointed out former scholars using Ri Yue Shi Li's disadvantages,such as giving strained interpretation and draw farfetched analogies,crashing Spring and Autumn Annals's aim,tuimoiling right and wrong.So Cheng Duan-xue made the point that Spring and Autumn Annals hasn't Ri Yue Shi Li had more persuasion.
Keywords:Cheng Duan-xue  Chunqiu  Ri Yue Shi Li  refute  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号