| 民事诉讼确立以"法律真实"为证明要求的合理性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 翁伟东.民事诉讼确立以"法律真实"为证明要求的合理性[J].常熟理工学院学报,2003,17(1):33-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 翁伟东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 常熟高等专科学校,社科部,江苏,常熟,215500 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 长期以来，民事诉讼中以“客观真实”为证明要求具有明显局限性，确立以“法律真实”为证明要求因其现实意义、可操作价值而更具合理性。追求客观真实作为一种司法理想应是证明目标而非证明要求。而法律真实是证据能够证明的案件事实，是具有高度盖然性的相对真实，人民法院应当据此依法作出裁判。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民事诉讼 “法律真实” “客观真实” 证明要求 司法理想 高度盖然性 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2794(2003)01-0033-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年9月5日 |
On the Rationality of the Proving Requirement of "Valid Truth" in Civil Actions |
| |
| WENG Wei-dong.On the Rationality of the Proving Requirement of "Valid Truth" in Civil Actions[J].Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology,2003,17(1):33-37. |
| |
| Authors: | WENG Wei-dong |
| |
| Abstract: | Limitations have been revealed since we had the "Objective Truth" as the proving requirement for the civil action. The proving requirement of "Valid Truth" has been established now for its being practical, operable and more reasonable. As a judicial ideal, objective truth should not be the proving requirement but the proving goal. The People's Court should judge in accordance with laws on the basis of valid truth, which is the fact of the case that can be proved by the proof and the relative truth with high probability. |
| |
| Keywords: | civil action objective truth valid truth the high probability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
