| 论预约合同的法律效力 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 文晓鹏,李翠芬.论预约合同的法律效力[J].四川教育学院学报,2013(11):43-47. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 文晓鹏 李翠芬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120 [2]昆明市石林彝族自治县人民法院办公室,昆明652200 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 预约合同的法律效力问题一直都是民法学界的争论的焦点,至今无法达成共识.阐述当前存在的关于预约合同法律效力的四种学说观点：“必须磋商说”“应当缔约说”“区分说”和“视为本约说”,综合近年来最高人民法院相继出台的司法解释及法院在实务中对预约合同的实际操作,主张采纳“应当缔约说”,并对其他三种学说进行评价,进一步论证“应当缔约说”具有的正当性与合理性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 预约合同 法律效力 应当缔约说 |
Legal effect of Precontract |
| |
| Institution: | WEN Xiao-peng, WANG Xia (( 1. School of Civil and Commercial Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China; 2. Office of Peopleb Court, Shilin Yi Autonomous County, Kunming 652200, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The legal effect of precontract has always been a subject of hot debate in civil law field, so far there is no consensus. This paper elaborates the four existing theories on the legal effect of precontract： Theory of Dutiful Consulta- tion, Theory of Dutiful Concluding a Treaty, Theory of Depending on the Terms and Theory of Treating Precontract as a Contract. Based on the judicial interpretations mady by the Supreme People~ Court and practices of precontract adopted by courts, the author upholds the Theory of Dutiful Concluding a Treaty and proves its legitimacy and reasonableness by commenting on the other three theories. |
| |
| Keywords: | precontract legal effect Theory of Dutiful Concluding a Treaty |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
