首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事庭审实质化视域下法官认知体系的建构
引用本文:胡锋.刑事庭审实质化视域下法官认知体系的建构[J].唐山学院学报,2021,34(1):21-27.
作者姓名:胡锋
作者单位:山东理工大学 法学院, 山东 淄博 255049
基金项目:山东省社会科学规划研究项目(18CFXJ20)
摘    要:刑事审判中的法官认知偏差具有阶段差异性,主要分为事实认知偏差、法律认知偏差和社会认知偏差,存在于证据材料处理、证据证明力认证、案件事实认定和案件裁判四个阶段;隧道视野、印证证明、经验法则、锚定效应、选择性注意和投射效应是法官认知偏差形成的主要影响因素.对法官认知偏差进行有效控制,可从法官自身修正、外部因素革除和程序制度...

关 键 词:刑事庭审实质化  刑事审判  法官  认知偏差

The Construction of Judge's Cognitive System from the Perspective of Criminal Trial Substantiation
HU Feng.The Construction of Judge's Cognitive System from the Perspective of Criminal Trial Substantiation[J].Journal of Tangshan College,2021,34(1):21-27.
Authors:HU Feng
Institution:School of Law, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China
Abstract:There are different stages for the cognitive bias of judges in criminal trial, which can be divided into biases of fact cognition, legal cognition and social cognition. The cognitive bias exists in four stages: evidence material processing, evidence proving-power certification, fact finding and judgment. Tunnel vision, corroboration, rule of experience, anchoring effect, selective attention and projection effect are the main influencing factors for judge''s cognitive bias. The effective control of the bias could be conducted from three aspects: the judge''s own correction, the elimination of external factors and the prevention of procedural system. The judge''s own correction means that the judge can further improve their professional ability through cultivation of rational cognitive thinking, improvement of professional knowledge structure, standardization of court language, reasoning of judgment documents, etc; As for the external factors, the negative influence of external factors on the judge''s cognition can be eliminated by preventing the improper intervention of administrative power on judicial power, coordinating the relationship between public opinion and judicial decision-making; And the procedural prevention mechanism can be improved through the establishment of pretrial judge and expert judge system, the construction of trial-centered case trial mode, and the improvement of sentencing recommendation system of public prosecution organs.
Keywords:criminal trial substantiation  criminal trial  judge  cognitive bias
点击此处可从《唐山学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《唐山学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号