| 论环境侵权审判中的选择性司法行为 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 凌潇.论环境侵权审判中的选择性司法行为[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2012,26(5):58-64. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 凌潇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川理工学院法学院,四川自贡,643000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 四川省犯罪防控研究中心(FZFK09-03) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在我国环境侵权案件的审判中,法官的选择性司法现象屡见不鲜.通过对系列判决书的判决理由加以微观考察,有助于揭示该领域司法权运作的真实面相:在诸多外在条件约束下,部分法官不得不根据对自身效用函数的评估,利用自身的司法专业技术,剪裁、切割法律规范,以实现相应的策略性目标,在外观上呈现出“形式主义——自由裁量”两极化偏移的特征.环境侵权审判中的选择性司法行为可能会给我国环境司法带来诸如增加防御成本、扭曲法律激励机制、法院人力资源的逆向选择等一系列消极影响.
|
| 关 键 词： | 环境侵权 违法性 举证责任 信号失灵 |
On the Selective Judicial Behavior in the Environmental Tort Trials |
| |
| LING Xiao.On the Selective Judicial Behavior in the Environmental Tort Trials[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2012,26(5):58-64. |
| |
| Authors: | LING Xiao |
| |
| Institution: | LING Xiao(Law School of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering,Zigong 643000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The judge′s selective behavior is common occurrences in the environmental tort trials of China.Microscopic Examination of a series of judgments is helpful to reveal the true face of the operation of the judicial power.It appears that judicial behavior has two dimensions,formalism or Discretionary.Based on their assessment of the utility function,the judges often take the appropriate strategic behavior under the cover of Normative discourse by specialized judicial technical instrument in a variety of ways,which may bring certain negative effects to the China′s environmental administration of justice,such as increasing of defense costs,adverse selection in human resources,and the negative externalities caused by the exercise of judicial power. |
| |
| Keywords: | environmental tort illegality burden of poof information failure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
