| 论洪兴祖《楚辞补注》对《文选》及其注释的接受 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭宝军.论洪兴祖《楚辞补注》对《文选》及其注释的接受[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2010(2):148-153. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭宝军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南大学,文学院,河南,开封,475001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金，河南大学2009年度校内基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 洪兴祖《楚辞补注》对《文选》五臣注、李善注都作了积极自觉的接受。洪氏大量征引五臣注并作了相应的处理,《补注》中对五臣注的征引要远远超过李善注的数量,但并不意味着洪氏更加看重五臣注,而是李善对王逸的注释未能赞一词使得狭义的李善注在骚类中没有出现。李善的注释体例在方法论层面上对洪氏影响或更加深刻。
|
| 关 键 词： | 洪兴祖 楚辞补注 文选 李善注 五臣注 |
On Hong Xingzu's Accepting of Zhaoming Literary Selections and Its Commentaries in His Complementary Commentary of Chu Ci |
| |
| Guo baojun.On Hong Xingzu's Accepting of Zhaoming Literary Selections and Its Commentaries in His Complementary Commentary of Chu Ci[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2010(2):148-153. |
| |
| Authors: | Guo baojun |
| |
| Abstract: | In his Complementary Commentary of Chu Ci,Hong Xingzu actively and consciously accepted the commentaries of Zhaoming Literary Selections by the ＂five ministers＂and Li Shan.Hong cited a great quantity of commentaries from the ＂five ministers＂with relevant disposal,much more than from Li Shan＇s commentaries.Nevertheless,this does not mean that Hong valued＂five ministers＂commentary more than Li Shan＇s,it＇s only because Li Shan didn＇t add much more on Wang Yi＇s commentary when he commentating on the Sao genre in the Zhaoming Literary Selections.In terms of methodology,Hong＇s rule of commentary was actually more influenced by Li Shan＇s. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hong Xingzu Complementary Commentary of Chu Ci Zhaoming Literary Selections Li Shan＇s commentary five ministers＇commentary |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
