| 宋词词派批评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘贵华.宋词词派批评[J].安徽广播电视大学学报,2005(3):96-100. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘贵华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北师范学院,中文系,湖北,黄石,435002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 宋代是词史发展的繁荣期。而词派的形成，则成为宋词繁荣的标识。虽然，宋人的词派观念、词派意识远远落后于创作实践，但宋代词派不仅是客观存在，而且还丰富多彩。关于宋词词派，前人提出了多种说法。但以苏、辛为代表的“豪放”一派，秦、柳、周为代表的“婉约”一派，姜、张为代表的“清空”一派，构成宋词波澜壮阔的景观。它们是宋词甚至整个词史上最具代表性、最具影响力的三大词派。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宋词词派 词派观念 词派批评 豪放派 婉约派 清空派 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6021（2005）03-0096-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-03-19 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-19 |
Criticism on Schools of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty |
| |
| LIU Gui-hua.Criticism on Schools of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty[J].Journal of Anhui Television University,2005(3):96-100. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Gui-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Ci Poems development is prosperous in the Song Dynasty, and the formation of schools of Ci Poems is the mark of prosperity of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty. Though people's concepts and ideas of schools of Ci Poems are far behind their creation, yet the schools of Ci Poems not only objectively exist, but also they are rich and colorful. There are different opinions on the schools of Ci Poems, however, the Haofang School represented by SU Shi and XIN Qi-ji, the Wanyue School represented by QIN Guan, LIU Yong and ZHOU Bang-yan, and the Qingkong School represented by JIANG Kui and ZHANG Yan constitute the grand view of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty, even in the history of Ci Poems, the three major schools are the most representative and influential ones. |
| |
| Keywords: | schools of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty concept of the school of Ci Poems criticism on the schools of Ci Poems the three schools of Ci Poems in the Song Dynasty the Haofang School the Wanyue School the Qingkong School |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
