| 叙事与述史：多元重合的精神空间——文学叙事与历史叙事比较的理论基点 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李凤亮.叙事与述史：多元重合的精神空间——文学叙事与历史叙事比较的理论基点[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,31(2):99-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李凤亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学,中文系,广东,广州,510632 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “文学”与“历史”作为两种叙事形式，其联系与区别一直引起人文学者的争议。通过梳理学术史上有关文学叙事与历史叙事的不同表述，将能够确立二者比较的理论基点。本文在分析“历史”概念的二重性及“历史哲学”演进过程的基础上，借助于对西方思想史上不同流派尤其是新历史主义学者观点的回顾，探讨历史与文学在叙事趣味、虚构方式上的类同及叙事特征、言说内容上的差异。文学叙事与历史叙事的重合与分野，为文学研究提供了新的更为开阔的方法论视界。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文学叙事 历史叙事 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-2359(2004)02-0099-03 |
A Comparison Between Literary Narrative and Historical Narrative |
| |
| LI Feng-liang.A Comparison Between Literary Narrative and Historical Narrative[J].Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2004,31(2):99-101. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Feng-liang |
| |
| Abstract: | Scholars of the humanities regard the relations and differences between literature and history as a controversial issue for years. This paper tries to trace back the different concepts about literary narrative and historical narrative, and establish a theoretical starting point for the comparison between them. The author firstly analyzes the meanings of History and Historical Philosophy. On this basis, through a review of thoughts of different schools especially of the new-historicism, the author discusses the similarities in narrative interests and fictitious methods of literature and history, and the differences in the narrative contents. The author points out that the comprehensive relations of literature and history will take new methodology for the literary studies in the 21th century. |
| |
| Keywords: | literary narrative historical narrative comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
