Partisan Balance and Bias in Network Coverage of the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections |
| |
| Authors: | Geri Alumit Zeldes PhD Frederick Fico PhD Serena Carpenter PhD Arvind Diddi PhD |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Journalism at Michigan State University;2. Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University;3. Communication Studies Department , State University of New York , Oswego |
| |
| Abstract: | This study conceptualizes news bias as a causal factor producing systematic imbalance in the coverage of conflicting sides. Partisan bias is distinguished from structural bias by coverage that systematically favors one side with more prominence and attention. Content analysis was used to compare the television networks' balance in their treatment of Republican and Democratic candidates in stories and segments covering the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Presidential candidates received balanced aggregate treatment in both elections. But individual networks differed in their partisan balance. CBS News consistently favored the Democratic candidate in both elections, unlike the mixed results for ABC and NBC. CBS's pattern of imbalance, especially in the 2004 election, suggests a possible political bias in its coverage. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
