| 略谈《文心雕龙》“史记论”之失 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王志民.略谈《文心雕龙》“史记论”之失[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,33(5):11-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王志民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古师范大学,文学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010022 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《文心雕龙》的“史记论”,多赞同班氏父子对《史记》的批评意见,瑕瑜互见,有得有失。笔者不论其“得”,而只言其“失”,并对其比较概括而笼统的措辞,进行具体阐释,以期得出较为明确的结论。文中多参考钱钟书先生《管锥编》和可永雪师《史记文学成就论说》中的有关精辟见解而有所异同和补充,如对“崇势利”、“羞贫贱”的看法等等。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文心雕龙 史记论 班氏父子 爱奇反经 条例路落 |
A BRIEF TALK ON THE FAILURES OF "SHI JI RRVIEW" IN WEN XIN DIAO LONG |
| |
| WANG Zhimin.A BRIEF TALK ON THE FAILURES OF "SHI JI RRVIEW" IN WEN XIN DIAO LONG[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy & Social Science),2004,33(5):11-14. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhimin |
| |
| Abstract: | In "Shi Ji Review" of Wen Xin Diao Long, Liu Xie, the author, agreed to the reviews of Shi Ji written by Ban Biao and Ban Gu, i.e. Shi Ji had defects as well as merits; Shi Ji had its advantages and disadvantages. In this essay, the author stresses its demerits instead of mentioning its merits. Besides, the author is to give concrete explanation of general terms so as to make the conclusion clear. In the essay, the author consults many brilliant expositions from Guan Zhui Bian by Mr Qian Zhongshu and On the Literary Achievements of Shi Ji by Mr Ke Yongxue. Meantime, the author expresses his own different opinions and gives the additional remarks. |
| |
| Keywords: | Wen Xin Diao Long Shi Ji Review Ban Biao and Ban Gu depart from the classics and rebel against orthodoxy be oversights and omissions |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
