| 中国古代目录学学术价值之反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 傅荣贤.中国古代目录学学术价值之反思[J].图书情报知识,2008(2):47-51. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 傅荣贤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心,哈尔滨,150080 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文反省了以"辨章学术,考镜源流"为基本旨趣的中国古代目录在具体学术考辨中的缺陷,重点指出,古代书目囿于"著录一批文献"的刻板形式,与它所反映的学术之间并不存在严谨的并列关系,两者之间只是点与面的对应,目录在考辨学术时的错位甚至无能随处可见。此外,古代目录通过文献整序实现对学术的反思,作为反思结果的目录系统又会反过来影响学术的接受和认识,目录对于学术的这种反作用尚未引起足够关注。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国古代目录学 学术价值 辨章学术 考镜源流 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-2797(2008)02-0047-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年9月27日 |
The Reflection of Ancient Chinese Bibliographic Academic Value |
| |
| Fu Rongxian.The Reflection of Ancient Chinese Bibliographic Academic Value[J].Document,Information & Knowledge,2008(2):47-51. |
| |
| Authors: | Fu Rongxian |
| |
| Institution: | Fu Rongxian |
| |
| Abstract: | Introspected the characteristics of ancient Chinese bibliography which oriented to distinguishing the humanities and science,testing the source and course.The author Points out that the ancient bibliography was confined of the stereotype forms of recording a certain number of books.So,the bibliography did not correspond the academies which its self aimed to show.Both the two often confront the non-counterparts and even missed the counterparts.Besides,as the results of the academic reflection,the ancient bibliography could in turn influence the academic acceptance and understanding which has yet to attract much attention counterproductive. |
| |
| Keywords: | The ancient chinese bibliography Academic value Distinguishing the humanities and science Testing the source and course |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
