首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

权利义务类型论
引用本文:王海明.权利义务类型论[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(4):132-136.
作者姓名:王海明
作者单位:北京大学哲学系
基金项目:北京大学创建世界一流大学计划经费资助项目
摘    要:一个社会,它的自然权利义务向道德和法定权利义务转变越多,该社会未被法和道德承认却应该被它们承认的自然权利义务就越少,该社会的道德权利义务与法定权利义务就越趋于重合一致,该社会就越公正:如果它的自然权利义务已经完全转化为道德和法定权利义务,以致它的自然权利义务等于零,从而道德权利义务与法定权利义务完全重合一致,那么,该社会就达到了完全公正的境界。

关 键 词:法律权利  法定权利  自然权利  道德权利  人权
文章编号:1004-9142(2007)04-0132-05
修稿时间:2007-04-05

On Types of Right and Duty
Wang Haiming.On Types of Right and Duty[J].Journal of Capital Normal University(Social Science Edition),2007(4):132-136.
Authors:Wang Haiming
Institution:Department of Philosophy , Peking University, Beijing 100871
Abstract:In a society, the more the natural right and duty change to moral and legal right and duty, the less there remains the natural right and duty that ought to be admitted by law and morality but in fact have not been admitted. And the more agreement there is between the moral and legal right and duty and natural right and duty, the more justice the society tends to offer. If its natural right and duty change into moral and legal right and duty completely, i.e. its natural right and duty is equivalent to zero, moral right and duty will coincide with legal right duty completely. Then the society will achieve complete justice.
Keywords:legal right  natural right  moral right  human right
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号