首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《水浒传》明清诠释之比较
引用本文:王平.《水浒传》明清诠释之比较[J].济宁师范专科学校学报,2006,27(5):5-12.
作者姓名:王平
作者单位:山东大学文学与新闻传播学院,山东济南250000
摘    要:明清两代对《水浒传》的诠释有着明显不同:明人认为是“忠义”之作,清人则认为是“诲盗”之作;明人对宋江称赏有加,清人则对之深恶痛绝.之所以产生这种不同甚至截然相反的见解,主要是时代和社会环境使然.但某一见解一旦形成,又会造成深远影响.这种现象应引起今人的高度重视,以避免在对古典名著进行诠释时,出现不必要的失误.

关 键 词:<水浒传>  诠释  忠义
文章编号:1004-1877(2006)05-0005-08
收稿时间:2006-08-21
修稿时间:2006-08-21

Contrast Between the Annotations of the Ming and the Qing Dynasty
WANG Ping.Contrast Between the Annotations of the Ming and the Qing Dynasty[J].Journal of Jining Teachers College,2006,27(5):5-12.
Authors:WANG Ping
Institution:University of Shandong, Jinan 250000, China
Abstract:There is a big difference in the annotations to in the Ming and the Qing Dynasty. The book was considered as works of personal loyalty in the Qing Dynasty, but as works of pirate in Ming Dynasty; the Ming people appreciated Song Jiang, while the Qing People hated him. These different ideas were caused by the time and social environment. Once an idea came into being, it would have a farreaching influence, which should be paid great attention to by people today so that we can avoid unnecessary faults in annotating classical works.
Keywords:the Outlaws of Marsh  annotation  personal loyalty
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号