| 环境管制政策与企业行为——来自高耗能企业的证据 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵晓丽,赵越,姚进.环境管制政策与企业行为——来自高耗能企业的证据[J].科研管理,2015,36(10):130-138. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵晓丽 赵越 姚进 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国石油大学北京工商管理学院, 北京 102249;
2. 华润电力控股有限公司, 广东 深圳 518001;
3. 华北电力大学经济与管理学院, 北京 102206 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:71073053,起止时间:2011.1-2013.12). |
| |
| 摘 要： | 环境管制政策通常分为行政管制和市场导向型管制。行政管制政策具有强制执行性特征,企业没有自主选择权;市场导向型管制政策通过经济激励措施,鼓励企业自主选择节能减排行为。选取钢铁企业和电力企业,基于结构方程模型实证分析了不同类型环境管制对企业行为影响差异。研究发现:市场导向环境管制对企业战略影响远大于行政性管制;而行政性环境管制对企业技术进步影响远大于市场导向管制;由于企业战略直接影响到企业其他行为调整,因此,总体上看,市场导向管制对企业行为影响大于行政性管制;此外,企业行业垄断特征越明显,越不愿意进行战略和生产决策调整。
|
| 关 键 词： | 环境管制政策 企业行为 节能减排 结构方程模型 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013-11-25 |
Environmental regulation policy and the behavior of enterprises-The evidence from high energy consuming enterprises |
| |
| Zhao Xiaoli,Zhao Yue,Yao Jin.Environmental regulation policy and the behavior of enterprises-The evidence from high energy consuming enterprises[J].Science Research Management,2015,36(10):130-138. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhao Xiaoli Zhao Yue Yao Jin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. College of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum Beijing, Beijing 102249, China;
2. China Resources Power Holdings Company Limited, Shenzhen 518001, China;
3. College of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Environmental regulation is categorized into two broad groups: command and control regulation (CCR), and market-base regulation (MBR). CCR is dominated by compulsory characteristics and it allows managers very little freedom, while MBR does not tell a company what to do but provides a clear set of financial incentives that are designed to influence behavior positively instead. Based on the structural equation modelling (SEM), this paper makes an empirical analysis of the various influences of different types of environmental regulations on the adjustment of firm behavior by using the questionnaires from power industry and iron & steel industry. Results show that the impact of MBR on strategy is much greater than CCR, while the impact of CCR on innovation is much greater than MBR. Since firm strategy has direct impact on other firm behaviors, in general, the influence of CCR on firm behavior is weaker than MBR. Meanwhile, the stronger the industry monopoly is, the more possible a firm will not adopt the adjustment of strategy and production decision. |
| |
| Keywords: | environmental regulation firm behavior energy conservation and emission reduction structure equation modeling |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
