首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国数据权演进历程回顾与趋势展望
引用本文:魏远山.我国数据权演进历程回顾与趋势展望[J].图书馆论坛,2021(1):119-131.
作者姓名:魏远山
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院
基金项目:国家社科基金一般项目“硬规则时代APP隐私政策‘合规性’研究”(项目编号:19BTQ059);湖南省社科基金重点项目“人工智能时代隐私与数据保护”(项目编号:17ZD028)研究成果。
摘    要:若要充分挖掘作为生产要素的数据的经济价值,须以明确的权属为前提。但数据的无形性和非排他性使其有别于传统民法意义上的“物”,且个人信息安全和隐私保护、企业数据安全和竞争利益维持、国家数据安全和数字经济发展的多元利益冲突导致数据确权举步维艰。现有研究正逐渐确立以公权性质的数据主权和私权性质的个人数据权与企业数据权为内核的“三线数据权”框架,但并未实现数据多元利益的分割,尤其未能将个人信息权和企业数据权剥离。后续研究应着力于合理分割各方数据利益以协调三项数据权的逻辑关系,实现个人隐私与信息安全、企业数据产权明晰、国家数据安全和数字经济发展的相对均衡。

关 键 词:数据权  个人信息权  数据财产权  数据主权

Data Rights in China:Evolution and Prospects
WEI Yuanshan.Data Rights in China:Evolution and Prospects[J].Library Tribune,2021(1):119-131.
Authors:WEI Yuanshan
Abstract:To fully utilize the economic value of data as a factor of production,the premise is that ownership must be clear.However,the intangible and non-exclusive nature of data differentiates it from the traditional things in civil law.Moreover,the multiple conflicting interests of personal information security and privacy protection,enterprise data security and the maintenance of competing interests,national data security and the development of digital economy lead to difficulties in confirming data rights.Available research gradually establishes a“threeline data right”framework with data sovereignty,personal data rights and enterprise data rights at the core,but it fails to distinguish the multiple interests of data,particularly the personal information rights and enterprise data rights.Future research should focus on reasonably dividing the data interests of all parties to coordinate the logical relationship of the three data rights,and achieving a relative balance among personal privacy and information security,clear corporate data property rights,national data security,and the development of digital economy.
Keywords:data right  personal information right  data property right  data sovereignty
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号