| 伪卡盗取存款的索赔诉讼中证明问题研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐晨.伪卡盗取存款的索赔诉讼中证明问题研究[J].湖南广播电视大学学报,2014(2):56-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐晨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆渝北401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2013年西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划资助项目“存款被盗取的索赔诉讼中证明责任研究”（2013XZYJS209） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 伪卡盗取存款的索赔诉讼中,证明问题的关键在于证明责任的分配以及待证事实的证明。证明责任分配与待证事实的证明困难并不存在必然的因果关系,因此并不能把待证事实证明的难易作为证明责任分配之依据。以规范说作为证明责任分配之基本原理,持卡人应就其违约赔偿请求权成立的要件事实——存在伪卡交易的事实承担证明责任,而银行应就其抗辩成立的要件事实——持卡人未尽到妥善保管密码的义务承担证明责任。上述两个要件事实存在难以直接证明的可能性,可以通过间接证明加以克服。
|
| 关 键 词： | 伪卡 存款储蓄合同 证明责任 间接证明 |
On the Proof Problem in the Claim for Stealing Deposits with False-card |
| |
| XU Chen.On the Proof Problem in the Claim for Stealing Deposits with False-card[J].Joournal of Hunan Radio and Televistion University,2014(2):56-60. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Chen |
| |
| Abstract: | In the claim for false-card, two kinds of proof problem should be noticed： the distribution of burden of proof and prove of the key facts. There is no certain causal relationship between the distribution of burden of proof and difficulties in the proving of the key facts, and there is no reason to distribute the burden of proof according to the difficulties in the prove of the key facts. According to Rosenberg＇s theory, the cardholder should prove the false-card, while the bank should prove that the cardholder hasn＇t kept the keywords properly. To overcome the difficulties in proving the above two facts, indirect proving is necessary. |
| |
| Keywords: | false-card deposit savings contract burden of proof indirect proof |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
