| 古代文论研究的“二重历史化” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高宏洲.古代文论研究的“二重历史化”[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,40(3):331-336. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高宏洲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西大学文学院,太原,030006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 古代文论研究大致有"求真"与"求用"两种研究路向,厘清二者各自言说的合法性非常重要。古代文论研究的"二重历史化"是对这一问题的积极回应,第一重历史化主要指通过重塑古代文论产生的特殊历史语境以"求真";第二重历史化主要指在新的历史语境下,通过将古代文论历史内化以"求用"。只有实现"求真"与"求用"的和谐贯通,才能更好地推进古代文论研究的发展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 古代文论 二重历史化 求真 求用 贯通 |
Dual Historization in Research of Ancient Literature Theories |
| |
| GAO Hong-zhou.Dual Historization in Research of Ancient Literature Theories[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2012,40(3):331-336. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Hong-zhou |
| |
| Institution: | GAO Hong-zhou(School of Literature,Shanxi University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030006,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The method of ancient literary theory researching has two ways: for truth and for use.It is very important to clarify its legitimacy.The ancient literary theory’s dual historilization is the positive response to it.The first is focusing on seeking truth by reshaping the special historical context where ancient literary theory emerged.The second is concentrating on seeking to use by making new cognition in contemporary era.The unification of "for truth" and "for use" harmoniously can better stimulate the development of ancient literary theory research. |
| |
| Keywords: | ancient literary theory dual historization for truth for use link up |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
