| 英语口语测试实践型评分标准研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 余方敏.英语口语测试实践型评分标准研究[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2006,28(2):77-79,94. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 余方敏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宁波大学,科技学院,浙江,宁波,315211 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 英语口语测试评分的关键在于保证评分信度。文章总结了现行直觉型评分标准受抨击的几个原因,着重分析了国外的两种实践性评分标准:Fu lcher的流利度评分标准和Upshur和Turner的二选一界限定义评分标准(EBBs)。把Fu lcher的流利度评分标准和英语专业四级考试口试(TEM-4SET)的评分标准进行了对比,讨论了其在国内大型口试中付诸实践的可行性。最后提出了实践性评分标准在我国英语专业口语教学和测试中实施的优势。
|
| 关 键 词： | 英语口语测试 信度 直觉型评分标准 实践型评分标准 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-0627（2006）02-0077-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-12-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-12-02 |
On the Practical Rating Scales in Oral English Test |
| |
| YU Fang-min.On the Practical Rating Scales in Oral English Test[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition),2006,28(2):77-79,94. |
| |
| Authors: | YU Fang-min |
| |
| Institution: | College of Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The essay,based on a critical review of studies at home and abroad,explores several reasons why the existing intuitive rating scales are criticized.It also introduces and evaluates two foreign empirical rating scales: the fluency rating scale developed by Fulcher(1993) and the EBBs by Upshur & Turner(1995).Through comparing the first scale with TEM-4 SET rating scale,the paper analyzes the feasibility of putting it into practice in large-scale oral proficiency tests in China,and advocates the advantages of practicing the second empirical rating scale in teaching and testing for English majors. |
| |
| Keywords: | oral English tests reliability intuitive rating scales practical rating scales |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
