| 基于引文分布与作者合著的学者p指数改进研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐璞妮.基于引文分布与作者合著的学者p指数改进研究[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(5):99-103. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐璞妮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中共成都市委党校图书馆,四川 成都610100 |
| |
| 基金项目： | XSCG2019-022) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的/意义]针对p指数不能反映引文分布,且未考虑作者合著因素的问题,在p指数的基础上提出pw-d指数,以提高学者学术影响力评价的准确性和有效性。方法/过程]将发文-引文曲线和作者署名顺序引入p指数,命名为pw-d指数。以CNKI为数据源,将图书情报和党的建设两个学科领域各32位学者2004-2018年的文献数据作为研究对象,从学科指数对比、作者排名情况、区分度、相关性等方面验证pw-d指数的评价效果。结果/结论]pw-d指数与p指数、h指数显著相关,相对于p指数,pw-d指数继承了其高区分度和高灵敏性的优势,且能一定程度上矫正引文分布和作者合著对p指数的偏差。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术评价 p指数 pw-d指数 引文分布 作者合著 |
Research on p-index Improvement of Scholars Based on Citation Distribution and Co-authorship |
| |
| Tang Puni.Research on p-index Improvement of Scholars Based on Citation Distribution and Co-authorship[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,2020,43(5):99-103. |
| |
| Authors: | Tang Puni |
| |
| Abstract: | Purpose/significance]Taking account of the difference of citation distribution and the author’s co-authorship,this paper presents a new calculation method for p-index,that is pw-d-index,to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the evaluation of academic influence.Method/process]This paper introduced the rank-citation curve and the signature order into the p-index,which is named pw-d-index.In order to verify the evaluation of the pw-d-index,we selected the literature records of 32 scholars in each field of library science and Party building from 2004 to 2018 in CNKI database.The Subject comparison and the author discriminations,rankings,correlations of pw-d-index with other parameters are discussed in detailed.Result/conclusion]The pw-d-index is significantly correlated with p-index and h-index.Compared with the p-index,the pw-d-index extends its advantage of high sensitivity and strong discrimination and can also correct the deviation of p-index caused by citation distribution and co-authorship. |
| |
| Keywords: | academic evaluation p-index pw-d-index citation distribution co-authorship |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
