| 科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张春丽,商丽娜,倪四秀.科技期刊开放式同行评议模式探索[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(11):1151-1155. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张春丽 商丽娜 倪四秀 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所《中国地理科学》(英文版)编辑部, 长春市高新北区盛北大街4888号 130102,中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所《地理科学》编辑部, 长春市高新北区盛北大街4888号 130102,江苏师范大学图书馆, 江苏省徐州市铜山区上海路101号 221116 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的]同行评议是科技期刊出版过程中至关重要的部分,其重要性已被广泛认可,探索开放式同行评议模式以期为中国科技期刊实现有效的开放式同行评议提供参考。方法]在分析同行评议的定义及现有模式基础上,探讨了科技期刊开放式同行评议的优势、劣势、机遇和挑战。结果]提出了三类开放式同行评议模式,即完全开放式同行评议、有限开放式同行评议和部分开放式同行评议。结论]不同的开放式评议模式具有不同的适宜性,可以很好的实现科技论文评审的透明性和公正性,需要在鼓励专家学者参与、审稿形式标准化、审稿平台建设、编辑能力培养上继续改进。
|
| 关 键 词： | 开放式同行评议 评议模式 公正 透明 |
| 收稿时间： | 7/9/2015 12:00:00 AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2015/10/15 0:00:00 |
Model exploration on open peer review of scientific journal |
| |
| ZHANG Chunli,SHANG Lina and NI Sixiu.Model exploration on open peer review of scientific journal[J].Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2015,26(11):1151-1155. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Chunli SHANG Lina and NI Sixiu |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial department of Chinese Geographical Science, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102, China,Editorial department of Geographical Science, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102, China and Library, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Purposes] Peer review is a vital part of the sci-tech journal in publishing process, and its importance has been widely recognized. This paper provided reference and suggestions for Chinese sci-tech journal to achieve the effective open peer review. Methods] Based on analysis about definition and existing form of peer review, this paper discusses strength, weakness, opportunity and challenge of open peer review of sci-tech journal. Findings] Combining with editors' practice, it puts forward three feasible mode of open peer review, fully open peer review, limited open peer review and partly open peer review. Conclusions] Different open peer review model has different suitability, and can be good to achieve the transparency and fairness of paper review. It needs to encourage the participation of experts and scholars, implement the standardization of paper review, construct platform for editing, and improve editing ability to achieve the effective open peer review. |
| |
| Keywords: | Open peer review Review model Equity Transparency |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
