| 老子的"道"与斯宾诺莎的"实体" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘斌.老子的"道"与斯宾诺莎的"实体"[J].江西教育学院学报,2004,25(4):14-17. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东北师范大学世界文明史研究中心,吉林,长春,130024 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 老子认为,"道"不是常人所能言说的,只能是道家的人采用道家的语言才能予以言说;斯宾诺莎认为,"实体"难以规定,因为"规定就是否定",但是采用逻辑的语言也是可以阐述的。"道"和"实体"都是以自身为原因的,这就没有给意志之神留下任何地盘。"道"是以"反"作为其运动变化的方式,而实体却是静止不变的;老子追求的是"道"的境界,而斯宾诺莎却以理智的方式追求真理。
|
| 关 键 词： | 老子 斯宾诺莎 道 实体 形而上学 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-3638(2004)04-0014-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月30 |
Laotze's "Dao" and Spinoza's "Substance" |
| |
| PANBin.Laotze''''s "Dao" and Spinoza''''s "Substance"[J].Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education,2004,25(4):14-17. |
| |
| Authors: | PANBin |
| |
| Abstract: | Laotze holds that "Dao" cannot be explained by common people except by Daoists with the language of Daoism.Spinoza thinks "Substance" is hard to define as "to define is to deny",but it can be expounded with logic language.Both "Dao" and "Substance" find causes in themselves instead of gods."Dao" changes in a way of "conversion" while "Substance" stands still.Laotze pursues "Dao" and Spinoza seeks truth with reason. |
| |
| Keywords: | Laotze Spinoza Dao Substance metaphysics |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
