| "回到康德"与"回到马克思": 两种视野与两种误读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王砚,庄友刚."回到康德"与"回到马克思": 两种视野与两种误读[J].淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,25(5):581-584,596. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王砚 庄友刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 苏州广播电视大学,社科系,江苏,苏州,215004
2. 苏州大学,哲学系,江苏,苏州,215021 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 理解与认识是有区别的两种理论活动,解释学与认识论是两种不同的理论视野。在马克思主义哲学研究中,“回到马克思”与“回到康德”是基于两种不同视野提出的口号。一些学者在审视这两个口号时,没有注意到二者视野立场的差别,从而产生了误读。
|
| 关 键 词： | “回到马克思” “回到康德” 解释学 认识论 视野 误读 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444(2003)05-0581-04 |
"Go Back to KANT" and "Go Back to MARX": Two Visions and Two Misunderstanding |
| |
| Abstract: | Understanding and cognition are two different theoretical actions, and hermeneutics is a kind of theoretical vision different from epistemology. In the research on Marx's philosophy, "go back to KANT" and "go back to MARX" are two different slogans based on different visions. Some researchers make misunderstandings because they ignore the differences. |
| |
| Keywords: | go back to KANT" "go back to MARX" hermeneutics epistemology vision misunderstanding |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
