| 《庄子》比较研究三十年之思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙雪霞.《庄子》比较研究三十年之思考[J].四川师范学院学报,2009(1):41-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙雪霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东外语外贸大学,广东广州510006 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究重点项目（06JDXM75002） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近三十年《庄子》比较研究主要集中在与柏拉图、卢梭、尼采、海德格尔等人身上，反观比较研究史的其他个案，《庄子》比较研究在数量和质量上都不尽人意。造成研究困局的原因有：翻译的局限、方法的制约、学科的疆域。“循环往复、净化澄澈”也许是传统的影响研究与平行研究之外，行之有效的比较新方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《庄子》 比较研究 研究方法 |
Thinking About the Comparative Researches of Zhuang Zi in Recent Thirty Years |
| |
| SUN Xue-xia.Thinking About the Comparative Researches of Zhuang Zi in Recent Thirty Years[J].Journal of Sichuan Teachers College (Philosophy & Social Science),2009(1):41-44. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Xue-xia |
| |
| Institution: | SUN Xue-xia ( Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510006, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | The researches of comparing Zhuang Zi with overseas thinkers have focused on Plato, Rousseau, Nietzsche, Heidegger etc. in recent thirty years. The quantity and quality of comparing researches of Zhuang Zi are unsatisfactory in comparison with the congener researches. The causes are the localization of translation, the restrictor of method and the barricade of subject. ＂Circulation and purification＂ maybe the effective researching means besides the traditional ways. |
| |
| Keywords: | Zhuang Zi comparative researches research method |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
