首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

教育的学术与审视——基于《北京大学教育评论》2003~2008年刊文的统计分析
引用本文:朱光明,阎峻,宋真.教育的学术与审视——基于《北京大学教育评论》2003~2008年刊文的统计分析[J].煤炭高等教育,2009,27(5):28-31,115.
作者姓名:朱光明  阎峻  宋真
作者单位:安徽大学高等教育研究所,安徽合肥230039
摘    要:本研究借鉴马尔科姆·泰勒高等教育学术研究的分析框架对《北京大学教育评论》2003-2008年所刊文章进行了统计分析,希望借此以窥“我国高等教育学术研究之一班”。本研究从主题领域、研究方法或方法论、研究层次三个维度的具体指标对《评论》刊文进行编码分析,研究发现:学者们研究较为集中在政策组织与知识学术领域,研究方法则以文献分析、经验综述和数量分析为多;研究层次上,则以院校、国家(地区)层次和知识理念层次的研究居多。

关 键 词:《北京大学教育评论》  教育学术  主题  方法  层次

The Academic and Examination of Education——Statistical Analysis of Based on the Articles of "Peking University Education Review" Published in 2003——2008
ZHU Guang-Ming,YAN Jun,SONG Zhen.The Academic and Examination of Education——Statistical Analysis of Based on the Articles of "Peking University Education Review" Published in 2003——2008[J].Meitan Higher Education,2009,27(5):28-31,115.
Authors:ZHU Guang-Ming  YAN Jun  SONG Zhen
Institution:(Institute of Higher Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China)
Abstract:In this study, carried out a statistical analysis by Malcolm & Taylor's analytical framework for higher education academic research on the articles published in "Peking University Education Review" from 2003 to 2008, we are hoping to understand the "academic research of higher education in China". The article coding analyzes the specific targets of three dimensions of the "Reviews" from the subject area, research methods or methodology, we found that the scholars are more focused on the policy organizations and academic knowledge, the research methods focused on the literature analysis, experience synthesis and quantitative analysis; the research level mostly focused on the levels of college, national (regional) and the knowledge ideas.
Keywords:"Peking University Education Review"  education and academic  theme  method  level
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号