Measuring journal performance for multidisciplinary research: An efficiency perspective |
| |
Institution: | 1. The Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 172 Gongreung 2-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-746, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Chunchun-dong, Jangan-gu, Kyunggi-do 440-746, Republic of Korea;1. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Department of Mathematics and Physics, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland;2. School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland;3. Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszów University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland;4. Department of Process Engineering, Łódź University of Technology, Łódź, Poland |
| |
Abstract: | One of the flaws of the journal impact factor (IF) is that it cannot be used to compare journals from different fields or multidisciplinary journals because the IF differs significantly across research fields. This study proposes a new measure of journal performance that captures field-different citation characteristics. We view journal performance from the perspective of the efficiency of a journal's citation generation process. Together with the conventional variables used in calculating the IF, the number of articles as an input and the number of total citations as an output, we additionally consider the two field-different factors, citation density and citation dynamics, as inputs. We also separately capture the contribution of external citations and self-citations and incorporate their relative importance in measuring journal performance. To accommodate multiple inputs and outputs whose relationships are unknown, this study employs data envelopment analysis (DEA), a multi-factor productivity model for measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units without any assumption of a production function. The resulting efficiency score, called DEA-IF, can then be used for the comparative evaluation of multidisciplinary journals’ performance. A case study example of industrial engineering journals is provided to illustrate how to measure DEA-IF and its usefulness. |
| |
Keywords: | Journal performance Journal quality Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Impact factor (IF) Multidisciplinary |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|