The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese |
| |
Authors: | Che Kan Leong Man Koon Ho |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, University of Saskatchewan, 28 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 0X1;(2) The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;(3) Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China |
| |
Abstract: | The present study adapted the “Blueprint of the Reader” in comprehending language by Perfetti 2000, C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort.
(Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press] as a framework for understanding Chinese language and reading comprehension
in a group of 361 secondary Forms 1, 3 and 4 Cantonese-speaking Chinese students (mean age of 15 years) in Hong Kong. This
framework with some modifications was tested with nine specially designed Chinese language and reading tasks with reasonably
high reliability and surface validity. The main hypothesis was that lexical knowledge consisting of derivational morphology;
correction of characters, words and sentences; segmentation of text into phrases and sentences; and writing to dictation should
explain considerable individual variations, as shown in the English literature. This was tested with component analyses and
multiple regression analyses. The total battery accounted for 66.80% of the variation while lexical knowledge alone explained
33.51% of the individual variation in the overall school performance in Chinese reading and writing. The second hypothesis
was that subgroups of poor and good language and reading comprehenders in Chinese would be expected to show overlapping yet
different component structures and their performance in the individual component tasks would be expected to differ as tested
with analyses of variance. The results confirmed this hypothesis. Task analyses of the written protocols of essay writing
and of morphological processing (prefixing and suffixing) provided insight into well-formed and poorly formed writing and
word formation according to principles of Chinese psycholinguistics and yielded information for theory-based practice. |
| |
Keywords: | “ Blueprint of the Reader” Chinese language and reading comprehension Lexical knowledge Poor language and reading comprehenders Written protocol analyses |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|