首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国知识产权侵权司法判例实证研究——以维权成本和侵权代价为中心
引用本文:詹映,张弘.我国知识产权侵权司法判例实证研究——以维权成本和侵权代价为中心[J].科研管理,2015,36(7):145-153.
作者姓名:詹映  张弘
作者单位: 1. 中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430073; 2. 福建工程学院法学院, 福建 福州 350118
基金项目:国家社科基金项目:反假冒贸易协定对我国的潜在影响及其对策研究(11BFX144),2011-2014;司法部国家法治与法学理论研究有项目:我国知识产权合理保护水平的证实研究--定量测度、理想水平与现实选择(09SFB3024),2009-2014;国家知识产权局软科学研究项目(SS14-A-01),2014-2015。
摘    要:为对我国知识产权实际保护状况作出客观评判,以近年来我国各级法院审理的4768件知识产权侵权案件司法判例为统计对象,重点围绕权利人维权成本和侵权人侵权代价进行实证分析。结果显示,知识产权维权"(经济)成本高"问题并不显著,但维权"周期长"问题确实存在,且多由确权程序引发诉讼中止所致。在侵权代价方面,知识产权侵权"赔偿低"问题十分突出,法院过多适用"法定赔偿"标准确定赔偿额,使权利人常常得不偿失,而"举证难"是导致这一问题的关键原因。建议我国加大对知识产权侵权行为的惩罚力度以提高侵权者侵权代价,并从解决"举证难"入手,破解"赔偿低"问题。同时,完善我国知识产权确权机制,以根治知识产权维权"周期长"之痼疾。

关 键 词:知识产权  维权成本  侵权代价  司法判例
收稿时间:2013-09-30

An empirical research on IPR Infringement judicatory cases in China by focusing on the cost of IPR protection and IPR infringement
Zhan Ying,Zhang Hong.An empirical research on IPR Infringement judicatory cases in China by focusing on the cost of IPR protection and IPR infringement[J].Science Research Management,2015,36(7):145-153.
Authors:Zhan Ying  Zhang Hong
Institution:1. Research Center for Intellectual Property Rights, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China; 2. Law School, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, Fujian, China
Abstract:In order to make an objective judgment on the actual situation of IPR protection in China, this article investigates 4,768 judicatory cases of IPR infringement in recent years and focus on the cost of IPR protection and IPR infringement. The results showed that the problem of “high (monetary) cost” of IPR protection is not significant, but the problem of “long cycle length” do exist, which is mostly owing to the too long procedure of IPR confirmation. As to the cost of IPR infringement, the problem of “low compensation” is very prominent. The courts always adopt the rule of pre-established damages when determining compensation, which usually results in the fact that the amount of compensation cannot make up the protection cost of right holders. Its key cause is the problem of “difficult to prove”. This paper suggests to increase the penalties for infringement of IPR and enhance the payout of infringers, while solving the problem of “difficult to prove” to increase the compensation for right holders. In addition, China should improve the procedure of IPR re-examination in order to thoroughly resolve the problem of “long cycle”.
Keywords:IPR  cost of IPR protection  cost of IPR infringement  judicatory cases
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号