| 沉默权:否定之否定后中国的理性抉择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 顾相伟.沉默权:否定之否定后中国的理性抉择[J].巢湖学院学报,2003,5(5):24-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 顾相伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学法学院,上海,200433 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 沉默权起源于英国，已有八百多年的历史。沉默权的发展道路曲折，经历了一个否定之否定的过程，至今已渐趋成熟。由于诸多原因，我国尚未采用沉默权制度。随着诉讼理念和民主进程的发展，中国引进沉默权制度已经提上了议事日程。沉默权应当引进，但应当有限制地引进，不能简单地拿来。在引进的过程中，必须采取辩证的、科学的态度，借鉴国外的先进经验，这样才能确保其移植成功。
|
| 关 键 词： | 沉默权 中国 否定之否定 无罪推定 刑讯逼供 程序主义 刑事诉讼法 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-2868(2003)05-0024-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年5月20日 |
Right to Silence: Chinese Rational Choice After the Negation of Negation |
| |
| GU Xiang-wei.Right to Silence: Chinese Rational Choice After the Negation of Negation[J].Chaohu College Journal,2003,5(5):24-28. |
| |
| Authors: | GU Xiang-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | Right to silence stemmed from Britain , which has a history of more than 800 years. The road of the development of this right is tortuous. It experienced a course of the negation of negation. Owing to some reasons , the sys tem of right to silence has not been adopted in China. With the development of litigation theory and democracy process, to bring in this system to China has been put on the agenda .The system of right to silence shouldn't be brought in carelessly. It should be brought in limitedly and scientifically. Only in this way can we be sure to transplant this system successfully. |
| |
| Keywords: | right to silence the negation of negation presumption of innocence extort a confession by torture justice of procedure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
