Competing priorities: Singaporean teachers’ perspectives on critical literacy |
| |
| Authors: | Xiao Lan Curdt-Christiansen |
| |
| Institution: | English Language & Literature Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637 616, Singapore |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper explores a group of Singaporean English language teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about critical literacy as well as their perspectives on how best to teach literacy and critical literacy in Singapore schools. A face-to-face survey was conducted among 58 English language teachers by using open-ended questions. The survey covered various topics related to literacy instruction including text decoding, meaning construction, and critical analysis of texts. The participating teachers believed strongly that reading and writing are transactional and interactional practices. However, they were less certain in their beliefs about teaching critical literacy including the critical, analytical and evaluative aspects of text reading. Some teachers saw a conflict between using time on teaching critical literacy and preparing students to pass their exams. As critical literacy is not a requirement at exams, they found it difficult to justify using time teaching it. The results suggest that the teachers’ belief systems are strongly influenced by the broad macro-structure of the educational system in Singapore and their own educational experiences. |
| |
| Keywords: | Critical literacy Teacher beliefs High-stakes examination Reading comprehension Text analysis Text decoding Bankable skills |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
