| 基于G1-DEA和TOPSIS-灰色关联分析的供应链绩效评价方法——以企业内部供应链为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何宜庆,李论,白彩全.基于G1-DEA和TOPSIS-灰色关联分析的供应链绩效评价方法——以企业内部供应链为例[J].科技管理研究,2016(16):68-73. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何宜庆 李论 白彩全 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南昌大学经济管理学院,江西南昌,330031;2. 南昌大学理学院,江西南昌,330031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目，教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金，江西省社会科学(2015)“十二五”规划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对传统供应链绩效评价在指标赋权以及样本数据信息挖掘上的不足,探讨一种基于G1-DEA和TOPSIS-灰色关联分析的供应链绩效评价方法。利用G1法和DEA法分别确定指标的主客观权重,引进偏好系数对指标进行组合赋权,在考虑TOPSIS法和灰色关联分析法各自优劣的基础上,给出TOPSIS-灰色关联分析法的原理和步骤,从而对样本的数据信息进行充分挖掘。最后以企业内部供应链为例,进行实例验证分析,说明该方法的合理性与较强的可拓展性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 序关系分析 数据包络分析 灰色关联分析 理想解法 供应链 绩效评价 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016/3/5 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2016/5/5 0:00:00 |
Research on the method of supply chain performance evaluation based on the G1-DEA and TOPSIS-grey relational analysis |
| |
| Abstract: | This article in view of the deficiency of traditional supply chain performance evaluation in index weight and sample data mining, discussed a kind of method of supply chain performance evaluation based on the G1-DEA and TOPSIS-grey relational analysis. Firstly, the GI and DEA method were respectively used to determine the index of subjective and objective weights in this article, and then the perference coefficient was introduced to determine combination weights for index. Secondly,on the basis of considering the advantages and disadvantages of TOPSIS method and grey relational analysis method, the principle and approach about TOPSIS-grey relational analysis method were given, so the sample data information was fully excavated. Finally, this article carried out example verification and comparative analysis to illustrate the rationality, superiority and strong scalability of this method. |
| |
| Keywords: | the method of G DEA Grey relational analysis Topsis supply chain performance evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
