| 两大法系认证制度的比较和借鉴 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 施延亮.两大法系认证制度的比较和借鉴[J].上海师范大学学报(基础教育版),2002,31(2):37-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 施延亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海师范大学法商学院，上海200234 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 认证制度是指对证据证明效力的审查判断制度，英美法与大陆法系由于,历史，地理，化等诸环境的差异，导致在认证主体，认证程序模式，认证效力，认证方式和认证规则等方面均有各自的特点，试通过对这些特点的比较，旨在对我国认证制度的有所借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国 经验借鉴 证据审查制度 比较研究 英美法系 大陆法系 民事诉讼法 主体 法律效力 认证程序 关联性规则 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-8634(2002)02-0037-(07) |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年3月15日 |
A Comparison of the Authentication Institution in the Two Legal Systems and Reference Drawn |
| |
| SHI Yanliang.A Comparison of the Authentication Institution in the Two Legal Systems and Reference Drawn[J].Journal of Shanghai NOrmal University,2002,31(2):37-43. |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Yanliang |
| |
| Abstract: | The authentication institution refers to that of examination and judgement of the effect of testimony. Historical, geographical, and cultural differences between the legal system of America & Britain and that of China result in many distinctive features in their respective authentication institutions. For instance, there exist distinguishing features in the authentication subject, in the pattern of the authentication procedure, and in the effect, the mode and the rules of authentication. Through a comparison of these features, the paper attempts to bring out what can be referred to by the authentication institution of our country. |
| |
| Keywords: | authentication comparison use for reference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
