| 请求权本质探究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴昭军.请求权本质探究[J].内江师范学院学报,2014(5):103-106. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴昭军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划项目“市民法’词源”（2012XZYJS124）支持 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 权利主要包含利益与法律之力两种因素,请求权本质上系法律之力,不存在被侵犯之可能.请求权实乃相对法律关系的抽象与提取,基于基础权利而生.请求权为基础权利内在的法律之力的外化,旨在维护权利所含利益.请求权成为基础权利向诉权过渡的中介,体现了私法对个人自由的极大关怀与对意思自治的追求.其与诉权在权利属性、构成要件和存在关系上均有差异,与债权在权利本质、有无侵犯可能和权能等方面亦存在较大的差异.
|
| 关 键 词： | 请求权 法律之力 相对法律关系 |
A Probe into the Nature of Claim Right |
| |
| WU Zhao-jun.A Probe into the Nature of Claim Right[J].Journal of Neijiang Teachers College,2014(5):103-106. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Zhao-jun |
| |
| Institution: | WU Zhao-jun (School of Civil and Commercial Law, Southwest University of Political Science ＆ Laws, Chongqing, 401120, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Right mainly includes two factors., interest and legal power. The right of claim is the legal one from its nature. And there is no possibility that it may be infringed. In fact, such right is relative to the abstraction of law and its extraction. Accordingly, it is based on law. It is the externalization of the internalized legal power of the fundamental rights, which is aimed to maintain the interest internalized in the rights. The fact that the claim right has become the medium of the fundamen- tal rights to the demanding right shows that the private law has great concern to individual freedom and pursuit of autonomy of will. It is different from the demanding right in nature, composition and existential relations. And it is not the same as the creditors~ right in nature, possibility of infringement and powers and functions. |
| |
| Keywords: | claim right legal power relative legal relations |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
