首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论朱光潜对约翰·罗斯金美学观的批评
引用本文:刘须明.论朱光潜对约翰·罗斯金美学观的批评[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2012(1):158-162.
作者姓名:刘须明
作者单位:东南大学外国语学院,江苏南京,210096
基金项目:2011年教育部人文社会科学研究项目“罗斯金与莫里斯艺术理论研究”(编号:11YJA760045)
摘    要:朱光潜先生在其著名的《谈美》中对英国美学家、艺术批评家约翰·罗斯金的美学观提出了批评,认为罗斯金混淆了美感与快感,过于强调艺术对自然的刻意模仿。但如果对罗斯金的著作作更全面的了解,我们会发现朱光潜对罗斯金的批评在某种程度上有失公正,他的批评对国内读者了解一个真实的罗斯金容易产生一些负面影响。罗斯金的“典型美”和“生命美”等美学理论是他界定“美感”的核心依据。在对待自然与艺术的关系上,罗斯金并非像朱光潜所批评的认为艺术家应该对自然不加任何选择,而是强调其想象力的参与。

关 键 词:约翰·罗斯金  美感与快感  自然美与艺术美

On Zhu Guangqian' s Criticism on the Aesthetics of John Ruskin
Liu xuming.On Zhu Guangqian' s Criticism on the Aesthetics of John Ruskin[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2012(1):158-162.
Authors:Liu xuming
Abstract:In his famous work On Beauty,Mr.Zhu Guangqian criticized the aesthetic theory of John Ruskin,a British aesthetician and art critic,considered him as mixing up the sense of beauty and the sense of pleasure,and over emphasizing the intended imitation of art to the nature.However,if we have a thorough understanding of Ruskin’s work,we may find that Zhu Guangqian’s criticism is unfair in a sense,and has left some negative influence on domestic readers’ understanding of a true Ruskin."The beauty of typical image" and "the beauty of life" are Ruskin’s core basis in defining "the sense of beauty".In terms of the relation between nature and art,Ruskin does not think that artists should imitate nature without selection as alleged by Zhu Guangqian,but emphasizes artists’ imagination and participation.
Keywords:John Ruskin  the sense of beauty and the sense of pleasure  the beauty of nature and the beauty of art
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号