| 专属性主题的中英文文献比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 翟翌,孙耀吾.专属性主题的中英文文献比较研究[J].研究与发展管理,2022,34(1):163-176. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 翟翌 孙耀吾 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南大学 工商管理学院,湖南大学 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学“开源情境下模块化平台创新专属性及作用机理研究”(71872063)、“高技术服务创新网络平台企业主导能力的演化机理研究”(71472061)；国家社科基金重大项目“数据赋能激励制造业企业创新驱动发展及其对策研究”(18ZDA063)。,国家自然科学基金项目（面上项目，重点项目，重大项目）,国家社会科学基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 专属性主题是创新研究的重要议题,对其进行全面量化比较分析具有重要学术价值。本文基于Web of Science核心合集数据库(1986-2017年)和中文CSSCI数据库(1998-2017年)中专属性研究文献,运用文献计量和内容分析方法,借助CiteSpace软件呈现专属性主题中英文文献引文共被引聚类和关键词共现图谱,结合图谱中重要节点文献深度挖掘,揭示并比较中英文文献所承载的专属性研究的发展机理、共性与差异。结果表明:专属性主题中英文研究有着各自的知识结构、知识基础及范式;在研究逻辑、主题涵盖和研究方法等方面具有共性;研究内容侧重和相似主题的研究视角存在差异,同时也存在不同的研究热点;关于理论渊源与主题形成,在原创性、连续性、系统性等方面存在水平差异。本文对于深入认识专属性问题研究特点、促进学术交流和创新实践、建设中国情境下的专属性理论体系具有重要启示。
|
| 关 键 词： | 专属性 知识结构 知识基础 研究热点 文献计量 比较研究 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019/8/28 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2020/6/15 0:00:00 |
A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Literatures on Appropriability Theme |
| |
| ZHAI Yi,SUN Yao-wu.A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Literatures on Appropriability Theme[J].R&d Management,2022,34(1):163-176. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAI Yi SUN Yao-wu |
| |
| Institution: | (Business School,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinese and English literature generally represent the research status of corresponding fields at home and abroad. The appropriability theme is an important issue of innovation research, and it is of great academic value to conduct comprehensive quantitative comparative analysis. Based on literature on appropriability of Web of Science Core Collection database (1986-2017) and CSSCI (1998-2017) database, using bibliometric and content analysis methods, the cited reference clustering map and keywords co-occurrence map of Chinese and English literature have been generated by CiteSpace. In combination with the in-depth mining of important nodes literature in maps, this paper reveals and compares the development mechanisms, commonalities and differences between Chinese and English literature. The results show that both Chinese and foreign researches have their own knowledge structure, knowledge base and paradigm. There are some commonalities in research logic, topic coverage and research methods, while there are differences between the research focus and the perspective of similar topics, and different research hotspots. In term of theoretical origin, theme formation, originality, continuity and systematicness, studies in Chinese and English have level differences. It has importante implication for deeply understanding the research characteristics of appropriability, promoting academic communications and innovation practice, and building the theoretical system of appropriability in Chinese context. |
| |
| Keywords: | appropriability knowledge structure knowledge base research hotspot bibliometric comparative study |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《研究与发展管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《研究与发展管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
