| 对我国民事再审程序的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 普金霞.对我国民事再审程序的思考[J].长治学院学报,2003,20(4):16-18. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 普金霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 晋东南师专政史系,山西,长治,046011 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国的民事再审程序有监督程序与当事人申请再审程序 ,前者凸现强职权主义 ,后者则存在申请难等实践问题 ,这与我国长期以来重实体公正、轻程序公正与效益的司法观念以及职权主义的诉讼模式有必然联系。淡化国家职权在再审中的介入 ,强化当事人申请再审的程序保障则是改革的方向。
|
| 关 键 词： | 职权主义 程序公正 当事人主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-0266(2003)04-0016-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年4月10日 |
Analysis on Chinese retrial system |
| |
| PU Jin-xia.Analysis on Chinese retrial system[J].Journal of Changzhi University,2003,20(4):16-18. |
| |
| Authors: | PU Jin-xia |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinese retrial system includes supervisory system and applied of parties system.The former is deeply ruled by doctrine of function and power,and there are lots of obstacles in the latter's practice.This results form the law concept,which enforced historically,about overwhelming substantive justice but ignoring justice and denefit of procedure.The litigation pattern embodied in doctrine of function and power is also the reason.The author holdsn the aid of civil retrial reform lies in diminishing the intervention in retrial of state power and ensuring the procedure of applied of parties system accordingly. |
| |
| Keywords: | doctrine of function and power procedural justice litigtantism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
