| 论诡辩 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张浩.论诡辩[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2001,20(3):5-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张浩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院哲学研究所, |
| |
| 摘 要： | 诡辩是一种与私有制同生共存的社会现象 ,它与论者的切身利益密切相关 ,谋求私欲是诡辩产生的总的社会根源。“求胜不求真” ,相对主义的认识方法 ,受思维定势影响 ,是其强辞夺理的认识论根源。诡辩论者以情感作为明辨是非的标准 ,在虚荣心的驱使下进行论辩 ,不依据事实而是凭空想象地推论 ,借助于某些人的盲目轻信以售其奸。对付诡辩的最有效的办法是不盲目轻信。凡事都要问个为什么 ,看其有无科学的事实依据 ,是否真有道理 ,诡辩也就没有多少市场了。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诡辩 社会根源 认识论 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-4970(2001)03-0005-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年12月18 |
On Sophism |
| |
| ZHANG Hao.On Sophism[J].Journal of Luoyang Teachers College,2001,20(3):5-11. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hao |
| |
| Abstract: | Sophism is a social phenomenon concomitant with private ownership and sophists’ profit. Seeking the selfish gain, on the whole, is the rootstock of sophism. To win in disregard of truth, conforming to the relativist mind-set, under the influence of thought stereotype, is the epistemological root of sophistication. Sophists, who judge by the emotional criterion, quibble for the vanity. They do not base their inference on truth, but supposition without foundation, and do evil at the advantage of some people's blind belief. The most effective guard against sophism is not to believe blindly. Ask why about everything, which to observe whether or not scientifically based on fact and reasonable, then sophism’s chances are dispelled. |
| |
| Keywords: | sophism social rootstock epistemology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
