| 新刑诉法中侦查讯问同步录音录像的程序规制:困境与出路简 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王永杰.新刑诉法中侦查讯问同步录音录像的程序规制:困境与出路简[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,46(1):53-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王永杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学科学研究院，上海，201620 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 虽然我国新刑诉法已经明确确立了录音录像制度，但是依然存在选择性录音录像、录音录像证据移送不明确、双方缺乏有效质证、不录音录像后果不明确等问题。基于对成因的分析，有关部门应当在借鉴域外有关立法和司法经验的基础之上，对录音录像证据的诉讼地位问题，录音录像的案件范围问题，质证问题以及违反录音录像规定的后果等问题予以进一步明确、完善，以确保该制度能够得到良性运行。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侦查讯问 同步录音录像 程序规制 |
Procedural Regulations of Simultaneous Sound and Video Recording Applied in the Investigation and Interrogation in the New Criminal Litigation Law: Predicaments and Solutions |
| |
| WANG Yong-jie.Procedural Regulations of Simultaneous Sound and Video Recording Applied in the Investigation and Interrogation in the New Criminal Litigation Law: Predicaments and Solutions[J].Journal of East China Normal University :Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2014,46(1):53-60. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Yong-jie |
| |
| Abstract: | Although the new criminal litigation law has stipulated the system of simultaneous sound and video recording, some problems still exist. For example, the sound and video recording is optional, and the delivery of sound and video records is not clear. After analyzing the causes, this paper suggests that we should, by drawing upon the legislation and judicature experiences in other countries, clarify and solve the following issues concerning sound and video recording so as to ensure the benign operation of this system: its litigant status, its judicial scope, its testimony and the punishment for violating the stipulations. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
