Chinese education and Pierre Bourdieu: Power of reproduction and potential for change |
| |
| Authors: | Guanglun Michael Mu |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD, Australiamichael_mu_0404@hotmail.com;4. m.mu@qut.edu.au |
| |
| Abstract: | AbstractIn the edited book “Bourdieu and Chinese Education”, a group of scholars in China, Australia, Canada, and the USA engage in a dialogue with Bourdieu and raise persistent questions not only about issues of equity, competition, and change in Chinese education, but also about the value, venture, and violence in using established Western intellectual frameworks for analysing Chinese education. In response to these questions, this special issue analyses and discusses Chinese rural education, teacher education, language education, health and physical education, and transnational education; and proposes a series of new conceptualisations, for example, regression- and network-based field analysis, Bourdieu-Chinese philosophy encounter, field of mediation, localised pedagogical capital, and new Chinese habituses (e.g., contemptuous habitus, diasporic cosmopolitan habitus, habitus (re)structuring). Such collective effort responds to the strident, and sometimes misleading, castigation of Bourdieu for determinism; and also disputes the non-reflexive, celebratory tone that consecrates the French sociologist and his canonical theorem, and hence reproduces the symbolic violence in the doxic academia. In this vein, the special issue is respectful for, but not restricted to, Bourdieu’s sociology, showing no timidity in questioning and contesting the framework of the famed thinker when research problems and findings demand so. |
| |
| Keywords: | Bourdieu sociology of Chinese education sociology of resilience reflexivity |
|
|
