| 重新理解创新型国家建设的“企业本位论” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙喜.重新理解创新型国家建设的“企业本位论”[J].科研管理,2021,42(9):24-33. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙喜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院，北京100070 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 科技部科技创新战略研究专项：“支撑引领产业高质量发展的技术供给研究”（ZLY201956，2019.11—2021.05）；北京市优秀人才青年拔尖团队项目：“北京高精尖产业创新发展研究”(2017000026833TD01，2018.01—2020.12)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在建设创新型国家的过程中，“企业是创新的主体”已成为中国社会各界的流行语言。但长期实践表明，这种流行仍然浮于表面，“科技成果转化”“市场倒逼升级”等竞争性认识在更深层次影响深远。这使得有限的政策资源并未充分且恰当地用于企业创新需求。因此，本文将“企业是创新的主体”作为整个讨论的核心议题。我们认为，当代创新表现出日益强烈的多技术、动态性、以科学为基础和以组织为载体的特征。正是这些基本特征决定了，与大学等科研机构相比，企业更能够适应当代创新的这些要求。这也从根本上决定了“科技成果转化”的局限性。与此同时，创新型企业所需的战略控制、财务承诺和组织整合，也不是市场机制“倒逼”的自然产物，而必须在特定的制度背景下、在非市场机制的支持下实现。这些回答共同构成了创新型国家建设的“企业本位论”，文末在此基础上给出了相应的政策建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 企业本位论 创新 科技成果转化 市场出清 创新政策 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-05-25 |
| 修稿时间： | 2020-11-26 |
A re-understanding of the "enterprise-oriented theory" in the construction of an innovative country |
| |
| Sun Xi.A re-understanding of the "enterprise-oriented theory" in the construction of an innovative country[J].Science Research Management,2021,42(9):24-33. |
| |
| Authors: | Sun Xi |
| |
| Institution: | College of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China; |
| |
| Abstract: | After 2006, "enterprise-based innovative economy" became the popular language in China. But practice in the past years showed that the popular slogan had to face to the resistance from contending understandings which deeply rooted in the whole society. The most famous two contending ideas are "S&T as frontward force" and "market as backward force" in innovation, i.e. the idea of technology transfer and free market dogma. Such conflict resulted in under-commitment to innovation needs in enterprises. This paper focuses on the "enterprise-based" topic in the era of construction of an innovative country. We believe that enterprises which have certain mechanisms are proper agents of innovation, which is determined by some fundamental characteristics of contemporary innovation. Specifically, we take contemporary innovation as an economic activity which is a dynamic recombination of technologies, one is science-based while the other is organization-based.
Based on this, the paper answers two questions. The first is why enterprises are the fundamental innovators. Compared with public research institutes and universities, enterprises are better able to recombine different technologies, and more likely to continuously improve products and technologies due to its division of labor and behavior mode, both of which are demand-oriented. That means only the enterprises can meet those fundamental characteristics of innovation, which also fundamentally determines the limitation of "technology transfer". Furthermore, because of crucial importance of absorptive capacity and complementary assets, it is the success of technology transfer that is the very outcome of the enhancement of enterprises′ innovation capability, which is always misunderstood as the origin and engine as innovation-driven economy.
The second question we paid attention here is the proper mechanisms those make enterprises competent agents of innovation. According to the theory of innovative firm, there are three social conditions of innovative enterprises, i.e. strategic control, financial commitment and organizational integration. All of these three are derived from intended organizational development and learning and deeply embedded in certain institutional context, rather than natural outcome of a market process. Therefore, the essence of "enterprises as the fundamental agents in innovative countries" is to define and design suitable institutional framework which promotes the emergence and upgrading of social conditions of innovative enterprises.
Some policy suggestions are given in the final part. Taking China′s specific conditions into consideration, it is important to break the stereotype of "innovation-driven development", e.g. to pay more attention to incremental innovation and high-quality investment. It is also a critical issue to release the bonus of the complete national industrial system. Such completeness is a key factor to stimulate local entrepreneurship, which is always depressed by oversized M&A to Western corporations. The third policy topic is to improve innovators′ reward by changing institutional buyers′ behavior, which is necessary to help more and more local enterprises to cross the barriers to entry and to build competitive advantage. State-society relationship is also crucial in innovation. Here we suggest suitable empowerment to society in certain institutions such as finance, labor and IPR. The fifth and last policy issue is the organizing of a heavy devotion in techno-science research which is oriented by the upgrading demand. |
| |
| Keywords: | enterprise-oriented theory innovation technology transfer market clearing innovation policies |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
