Expert Perspectives on the Future of Physical Education in Higher Education |
| |
| Authors: | Jenna R Lorusso K Andrew R Richards |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Education, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada;2. Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama |
| |
| Abstract: | Despite physical education teacher education/physical education sport pedagogy’s (PETE/PESP’s) significant strides in the past century, there are concerns about its future. Grounded in participatory research, and through an interview-Delphi method, this study purposefully sampled five male PETE/PESP scholars’ expert critiques of current threats, projections of probable and preferable futures, and recommendations for transformation. Data were analyzed through an interpretive approach. Findings included: (a) limitations in physical education policy, teacher preparation, and status as key threats; (b) more of the same conflicts in the probable future and increased cooperation regarding conflicts in the preferable future; and (c) proactively revising the subdisciplinary framework and doctoral studies as transformative recommendations. We interpret issues critiqued as threatening PETE/PESP’s future, and projections of the probable future, as reflective of neoliberal rationality that has renormalized academic work in de-democratizing ways. We interpret that projections of preferable futures and transformative recommendations call for a re-emphasis on ethical academic attitudes to resist neoliberalization and reclaim democracy. |
| |
| Keywords: | Academic ethics attitude Delphi method futures research neoliberalism participatory research |
|
|
