| 论张扬主体人格精神的两种崇高美形态 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王磊.论张扬主体人格精神的两种崇高美形态[J].淮南师范学院学报,2013,15(1):33-39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王磊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽行政学院安徽经济管理学院,安徽合肥,230059 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国审美文化具有多样性和丰富性的内涵。中国的崇高美类型既有基于自然价值取向并作为客观精神形态呈现的雄浑与冲淡，也有基于张扬主体人格精神之价值取向而具有主观精神形态特征的豪放与劲健。豪放的本体精神是道家的．而劲健则本源于儒家的人格理想。东方和西方由于对崇高阐释的文化维度不同，决定了豪放和劲健所展现的人格美内涵与西方崇高所展现的人格关内涵在多方面形成了强烈的反差。
|
| 关 键 词： | 豪放 劲健 主体人格 崇高 |
On two sublimity types of advocating subjective personality spirits |
| |
| WANG Lei.On two sublimity types of advocating subjective personality spirits[J].Journal of Huainan Teachers College,2013,15(1):33-39. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Lei |
| |
| Abstract: | Aesthetic culture in China is characteristic of diversity and abundance in connotations. The types of sublimities in China take the forms of xionghun and chongdan and haofang and jinjian. While the former are based on the natural value orientation and presenting subjective spirits, the latter are rooted in advocating subjective personality spirit orientation and are characteristic of subjective spirits. The noumenal spirit of haofang is Taoism whereas jinjian originates from Confucian personality ideals. The sharp contrast between the personality aesthetic connotations exhibited by the east haofang and jinjian and those indicated by the west subllmities depends on the differences between the east and the west in cultural dimensions of interpreting the sublimities. |
| |
| Keywords: | haofang jinjian subjective personality sublimity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
