Diverging discourses: Examining how college students majoring in communication define diversity |
| |
Authors: | Drew T Ashby-King Lisa K Hanasono |
| |
Institution: | 1. Drew T. Ashby-King (BA, Bowling Green State University) is a graduate student in the Department of Educational Leadership &2. Policy Studies at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 405 Student Services Building, Knoxville, TN 37996. Email: dashbyki@vols.utk.edu.
dashbyki@vols.utk.eduhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-2934;4. Lisa K. Hanasono (PhD, Purdue University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Media &5. Communication at Bowling Green State University, 311 Kuhlin Center, Bowling Green, OH 43403.https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-718X |
| |
Abstract: | Colleges and universities in the United States often promote diversity through a neoliberal lens by framing diversity as a celebration of individual differences or a commodity that students can gain by attending their institution. In communication courses, diversity has been conceptualized through both neoliberal and critical lenses, but limited research has investigated how communication students define and explain diversity. The focus of this study was to understand how communication students define diversity. We performed thematic analyses on open-ended survey responses to investigate how communication students define diversity. Four themes emerged from our analyses: (a) diversity is a mechanism for unifying communities, (b) diversity is an affirmation of individual differences, (c) diversity is a harbinger of acceptance and equality, and (d) diversity is a disruptive force that re-centers the voices of traditionally marginalized people. Our findings indicate most communication students define diversity through a neoliberal lens. However, 3% of our participants conceptualized diversity through a critical lens by explaining that diversity should create space for those who are marginalized to have their voices heard. We conclude by providing recommendations for communication instructors to incorporate more critical conversations about diversity into their classrooms and foster diverging discourses about diversity across communication curricula. |
| |
Keywords: | Communication Education Communication Students Critical Diversity Neoliberal |
|
|