| 博客名誉侵权,网络服务提供商该当何责?——“中国博客第一案”引发的法律思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王眉.博客名誉侵权,网络服务提供商该当何责?——“中国博客第一案”引发的法律思考[J].国际新闻界,2007(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王眉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国外文局对外传播研究中心 北京100037 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在对网络服务提供商为第三方承担责任的认定这一问题上主要提出过三种原则:疏忽责任原则,严格责任原则,不承担责任或者有条件的免责。我国相关的规章条例和司法实践都倾向于对网络服务提供商的责任认定适用疏忽责任原则。疏忽责任原则较好地平衡了网上言论自由和名誉权保护,但也存在着可能的缺陷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 博客 名誉侵权 网络服务提供商 |
What should be the ISP Liability for Blog Defamation? |
| |
| WANG Mei.What should be the ISP Liability for Blog Defamation?[J].Journal of International Communication,2007(1). |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Mei |
| |
| Abstract: | ISP liability for the defamation caused by third party is the most worth of thinking in the first case of blog in china.There is a tendency to apply the negligence liability principle for ISP in rules and regulations on Internet and judicial practice in china.Negligence liability principle balances very well between freedom of speech on Internet and the rights of reputation,but has some possible shortcomings. |
| |
| Keywords: | blog defamation ISP |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
